Tuesday, October 13, 2009

Whitlock is right- Rush provides entertainment

Whitlock is right. I remember first watching Rush in texas when Senior Bush was getting ready to lose it all to Clinton. Rush was a filler for me before Letterman came on. I used to switch it on only to irritate my wife with his comments. Honestly he was just entertainment to me- much like Inside Edition and A Current Affair.

Him own a NFL franchise? Good Lord- How much does network TV pay anyway? Would it make a difference though? How many fans know the names or political alignments of the rest of the owners?

How many players will be swayed by Rush and his "rutterings". In fact Whitman you should not have alluded to Vick and a "supposed" dialogue!

That's bad form plus it kind of waters down Rush's comments on slavery. I seriously doubt if Rush can ever make any kind of impact on anyone- except for a once in a while "Perot tale"- like the one where he was going to become the Republican head honcho or something. That would have confirmed one dead elephant.

No comments: